lazycute

引用:

原帖由 analysthinker 於 2009-8-7 08:41 PM 發表



你成日引我囉:smile_o13:

:smile_47: 你個icon 就引死我

chefung

引用:

原帖由 analysthinker 於 2009-8-7 08:45 PM 發表



個人愚見啫

事實上我識很多 PHD/ professors , 都並非特別 bright.

The most bright students I know, 10A, 9A, 4.0 in US top universities etc
All go to PhD/Professors directly

What you know are PhD in HK?

[ 本帖最後由 chefung 於 2009-8-7 08:52 PM 編輯 ]

Lustcici

咁, 樓主釣到叻女未？:smile_o10:

lazycute

引用:

原帖由 chefung 於 2009-8-7 08:49 PM 發表


The most bright students I know, 10A, 9A, 4.0 in US top universities etc
All go to PhD/Professors directly

What you know are PhD in HK?

:smile_40: :smile_40: 你d 英文真係好勁啊

analysthinker

引用:

原帖由 chefung 於 2009-8-7 08:49 PM 發表


The most bright students I know, 10A, 9A, 4.0 in US top universities etc
All go to PhD/Professors directly

What you know are PhD in HK?

See the logic?
bright students --> PHD/ Professors
PHD/ professors =/= bright students:smile_o05:

analysthinker

引用:

原帖由 Lustcici 於 2009-8-7 08:49 PM 發表
咁, 樓主釣到叻女未？:smile_o10:

點解用個"釣"字 ge ????

我好尊重朋友的

傾得埋咪朋友囉:smile_o05:

chefung

引用:

原帖由 analysthinker 於 2009-8-7 08:54 PM 發表



See the logic?
bright students --> PHD/ Professors
PHD/ professors =/= bright students:smile_o05:

I know the logics
But it's major portion of them are bright from my statistics.

analysthinker

引用:

原帖由 chefung 於 2009-8-7 08:56 PM 發表


I know the logics
But it's major portion of them are bright from my statistics.

icic
then you're a lucky guy la:smile_o12:

analysthinker

引用:

原帖由 lazycute 於 2009-8-7 08:53 PM 發表
:smile_40: :smile_40: 你d 英文真係好勁啊

咁我又用英文先:smile_o01:

Lustcici

引用:

原帖由 analysthinker 於 2009-8-7 20:55 發表



點解用個"釣"字 ge ????

我好尊重朋友的

傾得埋咪朋友囉:smile_o05:

願者上釣ma, 沒有任何不敬意思...:smile_o06: