上一頁下一頁
發新話題
打印

Flower photographers are looking for 18+ lotus to sit on (pt. 98)

 
收藏  |  訂閱
1.5k  34.8k

引用:
原帖由 多功能中場 於 2009-6-9 02:45 PM 發表 查看引用來源


you will be able to do so in july:smile_o13:
its too long, my neck is very long now

引用:
原帖由 mugen-purin 於 2009-6-9 02:47 PM 發表 查看引用來源
tats your dream , i dun quite like this quote, coz i know u need to work hard to get your target
Why my quote?
I don't need 36 24 36...
34 23 36 is better XDD

引用:
原帖由 mugen-purin 於 2009-6-9 02:48 PM 發表 查看引用來源
its too long, my neck is very long now
舌海旗?

引用:
原帖由 chefung 於 2009-6-9 01:46 AM 發表

Agree
64 is inevitably but it involves like few hundreds to thousands armless lives
That's the bad thing

I agree the suppression, from my heart
64 without blood is correct
64 with blood is wr ...
unfortunately, the student leaders were very firm in the stance against the government.
In fact, i don't even rate them as leaders. They are just a bunch of cowards that only wanted other's blood to be spilt for revolution so they can enjoy the fruits of the revolution.
The government MUST have read the riot act before the suppression. If they did, and the students didn't disperse within the time limit, then the government had every right to suppress with force.

引用:
原帖由 mugen-purin 於 2009-6-9 01:48 AM 發表
its too long, my neck is very long now
you will see more long stuff when i come back:smile_o10:

引用:
原帖由 -Leo- 於 2009-6-9 02:36 PM 發表 查看引用來源

i can say that it is what you guess and some of them is what you see,
we cannot prove it correct or not
isn't that enough already ??

引用:
原帖由 chefung 於 2009-6-9 02:46 PM 發表 查看引用來源

Agree
64 is inevitably but it involves like few hundreds to thousands armless lives
That's the bad thing

I agree the suppression, from my heart
64 without blood is correct
64 with blood is wr ...
i think its coz the strong resistence of student, gov't hv no choice :smile_13:

引用:
原帖由 -Leo- 於 2009-6-9 02:46 PM 發表 查看引用來源
i need back to work, cannot talk with all of you more details,
but i will suggest all of you read more information from China goverment, and try to understand what they are thinking and their logic, ...
wat is big hk?:smile_41:

引用:
原帖由 chefung 於 2009-6-9 02:50 PM 發表 查看引用來源

Why my quote?
I don't need 36 24 36...
34 23 36 is better XDD
i tot u said 40DD 22 36:smile_30:

引用:
原帖由 -Leo- 於 2009-6-9 02:46 PM 發表 查看引用來源
i need back to work, cannot talk with all of you more details,
but i will suggest all of you read more information from China goverment, and try to understand what they are thinking and their logic, ...
i don't really like their "報喜不報憂" kinda style......

上一頁下一頁
發新話題
前往最後回覆