上一頁下一頁
發新話題
打印

徵33-40朋友傾計

 
收藏  |  訂閱
3.2k  40.6k

:smile_o15: hi!morning^^

引用:
原帖由 J-WALL 於 2012-4-17 10:52 AM 發表 查看引用來源:smile_o15: hi!morning^^
Morning



引用:
原帖由 超級滑板仔 於 17/4/2012 00:16 發表 查看引用來源


bb bye
毛毛你好!:smile_o15:

Not really, but I really think Tung was the one who really tried.  Tsang was just riding on a good economic cycle in his first few years.

Now the mess has not been cleaned at all since 97.  The high real estate prices are still causing a lot of social problems, making it much harder for the low-income "middle class" people as well as SME owners, especially retail business owners, to survive!

CY will have to push similar policies again to keep the real estate prices under control, which would be sort of a vindication for Tung anyway.
引用:
原帖由 剩女春嬌 於 2012-4-17 10:50 AM 發表 查看引用來源
你既個人觀點都幾突出,分析亦見獨到:smile_o12:

我唔算有特別嗜好,都係一般香港人都會做既野:smile_39:其他就喜歡煮野食咁啦:smile_40:



Kt巧令仔咖。。。。。
引用:
原帖由 剩女春嬌 於 17-4-2012 09:34 發表 查看引用來源
唔識架,講下笑咋:smile_40:



http://i.discuss.com.hk/d/images/r10/androidD.jpg

早呀...^^

引用:
原帖由 groupon 於 2012-4-17 09:53 發表 查看引用來源
I think this is a move to increase popularity.  There will be more of these "candies" in the near future.  But the move to push article 23 will surely lower his score.  Very interested in witnessing h ...
楼价高, 工时長,教育差.  你认為這些原因不会影响人口增長嗎?
唔好开口埋口就话要靠大陸人唻增加本港人口

引用:
原帖由 terencel 於 2012-4-17 11:53 AM 發表 查看引用來源早呀...^^
早晨



春嬌放工未?

Hello妳好:smile_o15:



上一頁下一頁
發新話題
前往最後回覆