上一頁下一頁
發新話題
打印

Hot Runners looking for 18+ companions to run into the wild and naked (Part 115)

 
收藏  |  訂閱
1.5k  28.3k

引用:
原帖由 chefung 於 2009-7-28 04:19 PM 發表

Oh, my mom told me I had that too
Tall people will get this easier right?
After playing sports, with better back muscle probably, i don't have this problem now
ya. i'm much better to know compare to when i was in teenage. but when sometimes i think i can feel it when i run, coming from the discomfortness in the neck

引用:
原帖由 wannabe 於 2009-7-28 04:22 PM 發表


in oz, recession and swine flu have a certain impact on this but it's more due to the competition between the three domestic airlines and other foreign ones like SG :smile_o01:
air canada only has competition with one other domestic line, and a couple in the international
and Air Can is about to declare bankruptcy for the second (or is it third) time........

引用:
原帖由 futfuk 於 2009-7-28 04:38 PM 發表 查看引用來源


ya. thats the idea. but kinda makes you think where the money then come from, no?
LOL
You know, you lose a little bit service charge using the hedging service...
You are actually paying
but you know, the money which lost, are the players who sell short ( if you buy long ) XD

The dealer wins, at the end

[ 本帖最後由 chefung 於 2009-7-28 04:45 PM 編輯 ]

引用:
原帖由 chefung 於 2009-7-28 04:39 PM 發表

Real analysis is analysis in real number
They have complex analysis too

Give you some concepts that I know

Do you know why calculus work?
Do you know the first principle?
Do you know how th ...
first principle? is that lim h->0 = [f(x) - f(x+h)]/h ??

lol. it sounds simple and difficult at the same time.

引用:
原帖由 chefung 於 2009-7-28 04:42 PM 發表

LOL
You know, you lose a little bit service charge using the hedging service...
You are actually paying
but you know, the money which lost, are the players who sell short ( if you buy long ) XD
...
The dealer wins, at the end
considering AIG is now 75% (or so) state-owned....... the highlighted is a very questionable statement

引用:
原帖由 futfuk 於 2009-7-28 04:46 PM 發表 查看引用來源


first principle? is that lim h->0 = [f(x) - f(x+h)]/h ??

lol. it sounds simple and difficult at the same time.
f(x+h)-f(x) but you got the idea right, that's first principle

Who told you that lim h->0 is valid
That's the mathematican want to know
They build everything from the fundamental and that's analysis

anyways. crib time before sun comes up!!
gnites people....... :smile_o13:

引用:
原帖由 futfuk 於 2009-7-28 04:47 PM 發表 查看引用來源


considering AIG is now 75% (or so) state-owned....... the highlighted is a very questionable statement
It's because they are greedy and over-invest
It's just a dealer for Big or Small ( of course, one needs some good analyst to work out the pricing )
And you are the deader, you sure win if you have relatively large capital

路過....:smile_o13: :smile_o13:

引用:
原帖由 lovevk 於 2009-7-28 05:04 PM 發表 查看引用來源
路過....:smile_o13: :smile_o13:
vk,你好:smile_38:

上一頁下一頁
發新話題
前往最後回覆