上一頁下一頁
發新話題
打印

Flower photographers are looking for 18+ lotus to sit on (pt. 98)

 
收藏  |  訂閱
1.5k  34.9k

引用:
原帖由 -Leo- 於 2009-6-9 02:39 PM 發表 查看引用來源

if you compare 30 year to one life, it is a lot,
but if you compare 30 year to Chinese history (more than 2000), it is not too much.
However, you have to consider the time scale factor

The development within the present 30 years > 300 years in ancient world due to the motivity of everything - commodity, population, information, etc

30 years can tell a lot

Germany took 70 years from a poor broken country and reached to the 2nd highest GDP ( next to US ) around 19xx.

And China now reaches the 3rd highest GDP ( Per capita is still...very low ) by 30 years of modern development
30 years is a lot nowadays

引用:
原帖由 chefung 於 2009-6-9 01:39 AM 發表

We cannot prove but we can blow water XD
I love China and support the current one party domination PRC government. Demoracy will not gonna work in China at least, for another 50 years.

But we ha ...
Revolution always involve blood, and in the current state of affairs, there is no need to spill blood.
I have always believed that the Chinese government was right in suppressing the riot 20 years ago.

引用:
原帖由 多功能中場 於 2009-6-9 02:39 PM 發表 查看引用來源


do you like it?:smile_o05:
i like it, but i rather like to meet u in person

引用:
原帖由 clotinc 於 2009-6-9 02:38 PM 發表 查看引用來源


u freaks me out......is killing ppl gonna be legal if we like to ?? :smile_27:
but i like the idea "做又36,唔做又36".....
做(gym)又 36 24 36, 唔做(gym)又 36 24 36 is even better?

MM would like this quote

引用:
原帖由 mugen-purin 於 2009-6-9 01:43 AM 發表
i like it, but i rather like to meet u in person
you will be able to do so in july:smile_o13:

引用:
原帖由 多功能中場 於 2009-6-9 02:43 PM 發表 查看引用來源


Revolution always involve blood, and in the current state of affairs, there is no need to spill blood.
I have always believed that the Chinese government was right in suppressing the riot 20 year ...
Agree
64 is inevitably but it involves like few hundreds to thousands armless lives
That's the bad thing

I agree the suppression, from my heart
64 without blood is correct
64 with blood is wrong

Not sure how it turns out that
Really from the direct order from those bloodlust old chief officers?
from the strong resistance from the students?

i need back to work, cannot talk with all of you more details,
but i will suggest all of you read more information from China goverment, and try to understand what they are thinking and their logic,
DON'T USE BIG HONG KONG THINKING

引用:
原帖由 chefung 於 2009-6-9 02:31 PM 發表 查看引用來源

Exactly. That's why I laugh at the constitution

I understand why they wrote that down
Maybe some of them did have that heart
some of them made that in for their peasants support
some of them  ...
i do agree they should introduce the new laws slowly.......but i guess the gov. didn't think so......they just wanna keep pace with the other countries as they r already 50yrs behind......thats y they wanna enforce those laws at one go.......but too bad.....it seems their plan isn't work that well n they started to revise some of the laws after 2 yrs they introduced them.........:smile_42:

引用:
原帖由 chefung 於 2009-6-9 02:44 PM 發表 查看引用來源

做(gym)又 36 24 36, 唔做(gym)又 36 24 36 is even better?

MM would like this quote
tats your dream , i dun quite like this quote, coz i know u need to work hard to get your target

引用:
原帖由 -Leo- 於 2009-6-9 02:32 PM 發表 查看引用來源

another things you should know that the law explanation is not from the court.
i just give your the example what means of law itself and execution
Law explanation is not from the court, but mostly related to political issue

I havn't heard, recently, that PRC govt interferes in court case, except, political issue like political criminal like 64 ones, latest famous one 胡佳, or spy one 程翔

If they impose some law which they gonna to reinterrupt it, that's very ugly and politically stupid.

[ 本帖最後由 chefung 於 2009-6-9 02:49 PM 編輯 ]

上一頁下一頁
發新話題
前往最後回覆