done ... i'm done too and my eyes are rolling now after reading that MIT report
i hate reading online and it takes double time ... that's why i prefer reading newspapers with my brekky every morning before kicking off rather than online news ... oh i like to print every single email in my inbox out too ...
anyway, back to the main topic
both reports were saying similar things but i think MIT did it a little bit than CIT and i particularily agreed the following two:
"... if often unconscious ... psychological, sociological and economic studies to demonstrate that men are slightly, but consistently, overrated and women are slightly, but consistently, underrated as professionals. Over time, these small judgments can add up to a disadvantage for women."
if we can get this stereotype issue resolved it would help improve a lot ... not to be blunt but i feel like this is exactly what you've been doing this noon and overrating men
"... The committee found that differences in salary, space, resources and access to power resulted in "women having less or their being excluded from important professional opportunities."
in regard to salary and access to power, i witness this in business world too :smile_13:
perhaps the aim to get the number of professionals in both sexes balanced is a a tough nut to crack