上一頁下一頁
發新話題
打印

26女 - 想試下係度識個冇性冇愛(即普通朋友)既男仔有幾難 - #9

 
收藏  |  訂閱
743  7.7k

引用:
原帖由 chefung 於 2008-10-15 07:52 AM 發表


I am interested in many of things...
Read the news about the ban of shorting stocks of financial industry a week ago and didn't know the definition of shorting.
the news was referring to short sell
which is different

short sell means selling stocks that you don't actaully own
you sell it now and buy later to fulfill your obligation
speculators benefit from short selling as they think the stock price is going down
so they sell at a higher price now and buy the cheaper stock later lor...

btw, the ban was no longer in place...

[ 本帖最後由 macy18 於 2008-10-15 07:58 AM 編輯 ]

引用:
原帖由 chefung 於 2008-10-15 07:52 AM 發表 查看引用來源


I am interested in many of things...
Read the news about the ban of shorting stocks of financial industry a week ago and didn't know the definition of shorting.
shorting stocks is different from contracts. you should ask macy again what it is.

btw, i think macy has to explain to chef about the trading in exchange and outside the exchange.

引用:
原帖由 macy18 於 2008-10-15 07:54 AM 發表 查看引用來源


the news was referring to short sell
which is different

short sell means selling stocks that you don't actaully own
you sell it now and buy later to fulfill your obligation
speculators bene ...
Do you think the ban should be carried on??

引用:
原帖由 DSHK 於 2008-10-15 07:54 AM 發表


Hi Macy .. you should be o.k. now. gov becomes the shareholder, no financial company will be bankruptcy now.
haha... we look differently
anyways, it's a good news to the general public....

引用:
原帖由 DSHK 於 2008-10-15 07:58 AM 發表


Do you think the ban should be carried on??
i m not henry paulson
would be great if i m
but i can tell you i am a free market advocate...

引用:
原帖由 macy18 於 2008-10-15 07:59 AM 發表 查看引用來源


haha... we look differently
anyways, it's a good news to the general public....
Haha .. ys , I got what you mean. It will be not as free as before ....
Anyway, i think the whole ibank concept has to be changed and to secure the job will be the first issue now.

引用:
原帖由 DSHK 於 2008-10-15 08:03 AM 發表


Haha .. ys , I got what you mean. It will be not as free as before ....
Anyway, i think the whole ibank concept has to be changed and to secure the job will be the first issue now.
to a lot of our surprises

there's no ibanks anymore... this industry has become extinct...

my fina 101 also told me the rule of thumb in finance - high risk high return

hahaha...

I am always curious that about the global economical crisis even there is no war, epidemic, large scale disaster, etc.
It's like a cycle and seems there is a pattern in it.

Can't economy grow slowly but steadily?
It's like roller coaster.

引用:
原帖由 macy18 於 2008-10-15 08:08 AM 發表


to a lot of our surprises

there's no ibanks anymore... this industry has become extinct...

my fina 101 also told me the rule of thumb in finance - high risk high return

hahaha...
It's assumed everyone has the same information that equilibrium will be reached somehow =.=
I am pretty sure it's not the case for those billionaire and top company.

引用:
原帖由 chefung 於 2008-10-15 08:08 AM 發表
I am always curious that about the global economical crisis even there is no war, epidemic, large scale disaster, etc.
It's like a cycle and seems there is a pattern in it.

Can't economy grow slow ...
If everyone in the world works towards a steady growth yes... but everyone is greedy...

you lives in US and you know the property market couple of years ago

it's a collective failure... and now the US is doing a collecitve fix.... moving to a collective country

which is... hm.... sound familiar right?

yes, that's communism

上一頁下一頁
發新話題
前往最後回覆